This makes no sense. Unless you have evidence or proof you cannot claim rampant fraud. Evidence and proof make it Fact. Lack of evidence or proof make it Theory. Evidence compiled to date hasn’t met the test as almost everything they’ve take to court (over 30) has been thrown out or withdrawn. Only about 2 nothing burgers have been accepted. So far every attempt to turn Theory into Fact has failed in a court of law. Hence, it’s a debunked Theory.
Nevada allowed 30,000+ out of state votes to be counted
Boxes of mail in ballots turning up in the dead of the night in Wayne County (Michigan)
There was a coordinated effort that stopped the count in places like Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee and Atlanta
Voter turnout in many precincts was not realistic. In fact some had more ballots than registered voters
Signature software in Nevada voting machines was set to a lower level (50%) as opposed to the normal 70-80%
Signatures weren't even being checked on mail in ballots in some counties in GA,PA,MI
Data dumps showing Biden with thousands of votes to Trump's zero. Statistically impossible
Republican poll watchers were not allowed in some precincts. In others they were restricted to 25 or more feet away. They were bullied, harassed, intimidated.
I've seen massive statistical analysis studies that prove scientifically the improbability of some of the vote results.
Hundreds of thousands of ballots showing Biden chosen for president but nobody else down ballot. I believe there were 90,000 in GA alone.
Rejection rates far below the normal average for mail in and absentee ballots
I believe that there are several hundred sworn affidavits from poll workers, electors etc. who witnessed corruption and/or irregularities in the voting process.
The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. However, courts are not deciding based on the whole they are looking at individual instances and rendering judgement based on that.