Have you got the Vaccine

[stripfan]

Account Suspended

 

[jimmyd]

I was responding to Sy barite about “social media” companies like Facebook (which I have) and Twitter (which I don’t have) when he asked if I have a problem with what they did. Companies being plural, not singular, dumbass, and refers to all companies in that information medium. You brought up Twitter to push theatre conversation off on another tangent. So me stating I don’t have Twitter is a separate direct response to you.

While not a lawyer I actually understand the major components of business contracts as I regularly deal with them and approve much of what goes in them when they become tailored for specific customers. And that concept of a terms and services agreement (the little box) is common across virtually every service platform. If a dispute ever comes up, a court of law will simple look at the T&C’s and whether it was agreed upon. They will simply see if you signed the agreement and it was our obligation to read it first so you cannot claim “I didn’t know” or “I didn’t read it”. You questioning that simple known fact indicates that you are oblivious to that just like you seem to be oblivious to most thing in life. Although, in your defence, I guess you can take the position that you lack the mental capacity to understand what you were signing and under the care of a custodian and care giver.

You seem to have in your mind that “free speech” means people can say or print or publish whatever they want. That is just not true. Hate speech is illegal, inciting riots is not protected be free speech, if someone makes a false and harmful statement (verbal or written), the the person or company on the receiving end can sue for harm (slander or libel), etc. Many things are excluded. But more importantly is that media companies, which now includes social media platforms, have the right to publish or not publish what they want. The real “freedom” is their freedom to choose what they allow to be published before it goes out or in the case of social media companies they are free to set policies of what is allowed on their platform which means the are free delete posts after the fact.

With the ending of the Freedom Doctrine that law, to force right and left to be balanced, was gone. This now means right-wing only needs to push right-wing agenda items and left-wing only needs to push left-wing agenda items. That is the playing field you don’t see. Hate the game, not the player. I hate the game, but I can at least see the playing field while you are busy staring at the birds in the sky. If you hate the game then force a change of the rules and put the Freedom Doctrine back and face the consequences (bye bye Info Wars, and others and open all media (including social media) to more government control and regulations)

Trump just filed a lawsuit against Twitter and Facebook. If he loses, the courts would agree with my terms and services position whether directly stating that or indirectly by saying the first amendment doesn’t apply in this case. The actual legal experts commenting on this lawsuit seem to generally agree that he’ll lose since the first amendment is aimed at governments and not companies. Although, this “lawsuit” is just the dog and pony show while he raises more money and continues his grift.

I’m trying to be as respectful as possible, but you make it really hard. You make big, bold, dumb, factually wrong statements, and then act like you didn’t make them at all. Or you try to walk them back, change the subject, claim you’re misunderstood, or the other person is too stupid to understand you. Seems like you think the more you write, the more you are saying and the smarter you seem. And you just wrote paragraphs on Freedom of Speech and the Freedom Doctrine when you and I have never discussed either.

You obviously understand shit about Terms of Service. Because you’d understand they would be applied equally. They can’t claim they’re fair and balanced following their own rules, then ban someone permanently for something, but also allow hardcore porn, along with murders, beatings, and BLM, Antifa, and terrorists calling for violence. But your bias makes you think that it’s fair that Trump got kicked off. Ironically, you probably can’t even point to an individual tweet that would’ve led to that decision. You’re so obviously out of your depth, but you keep coming back for more. I guess, it’s an admirable quality.

With all the writing you’ve done, you still will not answer the question of double standards. Is that the manifestation of your own double standards?

You’re probably right about Trump not winning his case. Even if his case has legs, Google, Facebook, Twitter have enough money to keep it in the courts for decades. But if you’re going to comment on the case, you should learn what it’s all about. This is not solely a first amendment case. They are private companies and don’t have to follow the constitution. The lawsuit, at least against Twitter, alleges that Twitter is subject to constitutional requirements, such as the first amendment, because they have become a state actor. Also Twitter has increasingly engaged in impermissible censorship resulting from threatened legislative action, a misguided reliance on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They can’t have it both ways.

For any dope that thinks it’s ok to remove the sitting president from social media platforms (one of the most effective ways to communicate with constituents) you’re a partisan hack, and haven’t thought it through. One day it will be your guy/girl.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

And to counter the bullshit from the dumbfucks here

Fact Check-These four leaders were not killed for opposing COVID-19 vaccination

Social media users suggested four African leaders who died in recent months were killed for opposing COVID-19 vaccinations for their citizens. Although some of them were coronavirus sceptics, one died of cancer, two are suspected of having died of COVID-19 and the fourth...

www.reuters.com

Is this fact check more or less credible than the early fact checks on the lab leak theory?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[stripfan]

‘ASTRA ZENECA KILLED MY HUSBAND’

So sad. Protect yourself, and your loved ones, from the completely unnecessary experimental vaccines,

www.bitchute.com

 

[Hornet]

I’m trying to be as respectful as possible, but you make it really hard. You make big, bold, dumb, factually wrong statements, and then act like you didn’t make them at all. Or you try to walk them back, change the subject, claim you’re misunderstood, or the other person is too stupid to understand you. Seems like you think the more you write, the more you are saying and the smarter you seem. And you just wrote paragraphs on Freedom of Speech and the Freedom Doctrine when you and I have never discussed either.

You obviously understand shit about Terms of Service. Because you’d understand they would be applied equally. They can’t claim they’re fair and balanced following their own rules, then ban someone permanently for something, but also allow hardcore porn, along with murders, beatings, and BLM, Antifa, and terrorists calling for violence. But your bias makes you think that it’s fair that Trump got kicked off. Ironically, you probably can’t even point to an individual tweet that would’ve led to that decision. You’re so obviously out of your depth, but you keep coming back for more. I guess, it’s an admirable quality.

With all the writing you’ve done, you still will not answer the question of double standards. Is that the manifestation of your own double standards?

You’re probably right about Trump not winning his case. Even if his case has legs, Google, Facebook, Twitter have enough money to keep it in the courts for decades. But if you’re going to comment on the case, you should learn what it’s all about. This is not solely a first amendment case. They are private companies and don’t have to follow the constitution. The lawsuit, at least against Twitter, alleges that Twitter is subject to constitutional requirements, such as the first amendment, because they have become a state actor. Also Twitter has increasingly engaged in impermissible censorship resulting from threatened legislative action, a misguided reliance on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They can’t have it both ways.

For any dope that thinks it’s ok to remove the sitting president from social media platforms (one of the most effective ways to communicate with constituents) you’re a partisan hack, and haven’t thought it through. One day it will be your guy/girl.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t have to answer any “double standards” question simply because I’m not on any oversight committee over Twitter or Facebook to ensure they are applied consistently. Facebook had to actually create an independent committee to rule on Facebook’s actions to continue to ban or reinstate Trump. Should all companies adhere to their policies in all cases = yes. But how to you even know it’s a “double standard”? Have you read the terms of service in detail? How do you know the other tweets are violating those terms of service? Is there a difference between one tweet and banning or a repeated storm of tweets? Have you considered that Trump repeatedly violated the terms and conditions before Jan 6th and they let it go? Have a read

Why Twitter says it banned President Trump | TechCrunch

Twitter permanently banned the U.S. president Friday, taking a dramatic step to limit Trump's ability to communicate with his followers. That decision,

techcrunch.com

And then do some more research in that Twitter made the decision (after many second chances before) after an “all-hands” meeting at Twitter including an employee outcry. This would mean there was a consistent application of the standards up until something else happened to force the ban. I wonder what that something else was? Oh yeh, January 6th happened and that was that something else. But more on that a little down the page. More importantly, why are you pulling out singular tweets to show me thinking I have any power over Twitter thinking I can just pick up the phone and tell them to delete? If you have a problem with a tweet, then get off your lazy ass a file a complaint to Twitter yourself because I’m not the Twitter police. Or form a movement and take it to the US Congress for some changes in the law. But stop crying like a little bitch because your guy lost fair and square but he’s too thin skinned to accept it. You throw out a bunch of “whataboutism” and get so sensitive when I don’t “automatically” agree with any of them. Well, get over it and grow up. Because, other than it affecting my investment portfolio by a tiny fraction of one percent, or I don’t see my contacts birthday notices, I could care less if Twitter or Facebook disappeared forever because life will go on just like it did before they came into existence.

The first Amendment is about the government, as you allude to. But you are actually stating that it applies here because Twitter is now a state actor? Exactly how are you going to prove that Twitter is being run by any state actor for that case to be valid, ecpecially when their ban was to ban the Head of State? Now if by “state”, you mean the government putting pressure on Twitter to repeal Section 230 that the lawsuit suit have been filed against the government and not Twitter (which again was Trump’s own government up until January 20th and one where Trump himself threatened to repeal Section 230 himself, so I don’t get the argument that “hey, I’m suing Twitter because somebody else did what I also did but this time it was against me so now it’s wrong but when I did it for my own self interest that was ok”). Your tin foil hat might be too tight for your head due to head swelling.

Go back and read why they banned Trump. He repeatedly spread false lies about the election (nothing has been proven to be fraud, not even after months of recounting in Arizona), there was an insurrection attempt on Jan 6th to stop Biden’s certification (Pence had no constitutional power to stop the certification process) and there was a real risk it would happen again. Let me make this clear, January 6th was an attempt to overthrow the US government by a mob of brainwashed Trump supporters fueled by Trump’s words (many of those charged have actually stated that Trump “told them” to go and storm the Capitol in their defence. Whether you think Trump did or did not is totally irrelevant because those that where actually charged with the crime actually did think just that and some even felt betrayed when Trump didn’t pardon them. These are the type of people who can be manipulated to do it again). It therefore could be argued that Twitter banning Trump and his rhetoric that fuels these insurrectionist tendencies was actually a patriotic move to protect US democracy from a real and impending threat form future insurrectionists. There is an oath taken by those who serve that they will protect the country from all enemies, “foreign and domestic”. If the domestic enemies both believe Trump’s rhetoric and are willing to act on it, then removing that rhetoric is a measure of defence against America’s enemies (do,serif enemies). And if you think private enterprises lose all their business rights when it comes to anything relating to, the then, or current sitting President (I’ll make this clear for you, the President is only a Temp employee hired by the people of the US that is also subject to removal/dismissal) then you favour Dictatorship over Democracy as you want to set aside all those rights and laws and replace it with the only law of the land being the Law of Trump. I’ll start calling you Sergi or Yrui from now on.

What you need to do is assess why he is really doing this: to make money! He’s just another Kardashian in that way as their source of income is popularity. Right as he came out with what I strongly believe will be a bogus lawsuit he asked for donations. He’s not going to run again, but as long aspeople think he will they will keep throwing money at him and money and fame are the only things he cares about.

You view Twitter as an effective way to communicate with constituents. If you believe 140-280 characters is an effective communication method, why are you writing long posts? Why aren’t all your posts held to a 140-280 character limit? But if you believe 140-280 characters is the most effective way to communicate to his constituents I guess you are calling everyone who voted for him too stupid to understand any thing longer than that. Well, I guessed you failed to recognize that he has an entire communication department that he rarely used to make “official statements”, you know, meaningful ones. Instead, he had to use Twitter and then his communications directors were in constant cleanup mode trying to walk back his tweets. He also had the ability to hold press conferences in front of reporters,and then have media air it and report on it but he rarely used.these. Both avenues are not subject to the terms and conditions of Twitter so they should have been preferred. No president relied on Twitter like a drug addiction needing a fix before Trump. He choose to use a platform that was not under his, or the governments control, at the risk of being kicked off instead of all the traditional channels at his immediate disposal. He violated Twitter’s terms, got kicked off, cried about it like a big baby and that his problem.

As for me calling you an idiot and other words, I have said this over and over again, you (and the other dumbfucks) started with the insults towards me first. Others like Sy barite can keep the discussion civil, but your impulses meant you could not. Once the gloves come off they NEVER go back on. So as long as you are on this board, you will be on the receiving end of that language from me, forever.

 

[jimmyd]

I don’t have to answer any “double standards” question simply because I’m not on any oversight committee over Twitter or Facebook to ensure they are applied consistently. Facebook had to actually create an independent committee to rule on Facebook’s actions to continue to ban or reinstate Trump. Should all companies adhere to their policies in all cases = yes. But how to you even know it’s a “double standard”? Have you read the terms of service in detail? How do you know the other tweets are violating those terms of service? Is there a difference between one tweet and banning or a repeated storm of tweets? Have you considered that Trump repeatedly violated the terms and conditions before Jan 6th and they let it go? This would mean there is a consistent application of the standards until something else happened. Oh yeh, January 6th happened. But more on that a little down the page. More importantly, why are you pulling out singular tweets to show me thinking I have any power over Twitter thinking I can just pick up the phone and tell them to delete? If you have a problem with a tweet, then get off your lazy ass a file a complaint to Twitter yourself because I’m not the Twitter police. Or form a movement and take it to the US Congress. You throw out a bunch of “whataboutism” and get so sensitive when I don’t “automatically” agree with any of them. Well, get over it and grow up. Because, other than it affecting my investment portfolio by a fraction of one percent, or I don’t see my contacts birthday notices, I could care less if Twitter or Facebook disappeared forever because life will go on just like it did before they came into existence.

The first Amendment is about the government, as you allude to. But you are actually stating that it applies here because Twitter is now a state actor? Exactly how are you going to prove that Twitter is being run by any state actor for that case to be valid, ecpecially when their ban was to ban the Head of State? Now if by “state”, you mean the government putting pressure on Twitter to repeal Section 230 that the lawsuit suit have been filed against the government and not Twitter (which again was Trump’s own government up until January 20th and one where Trump himself threatened to repeal Section 230 himself, so I don’t get the argument that “hey, I’m suing Twitter because somebody else did what I also did but this time it was against me so now it’s wrong but when I did it for my own self interest that was ok”). Your tin foil hat might be too tight for your head due to head swelling.

Go back and read why they banned Trump. He repeatedly spread false lies about the election (nothing has been proven to be fraud, not even after months of recounting in Arizona), there was an insurrection attempt on Jan 6th to stop Biden’s certification (Pence had no constitutional power to stop the certification process) and there was a real risk it would happen again. Let me make this clear, January 6th was an attempt to overthrow the US government by a mob of brainwashed Trump supporters fueled by Trump’s words (many of those charged have actually stated that Trump “told them” to go and storm the Capitol in their defence. Whether you think Trump did or did not is totally irrelevant because those that where actually charged with the crime actually did think just that and some even felt betrayed when Trump didn’t pardon them. These are the type of people who can be manipulated to do it again). It therefore could be argued that Twitter banning Trump and his rhetoric that fuels these insurrectionist tendencies was actually a patriotic move to protect US democracy from a real and impending threat form future insurrectionists. There is an oath taken by those who serve that they will protect the country from all enemies, “foreign and domestic”. If the domestic enemies both believe Trump’s rhetoric and are willing to act on it, then removing that rhetoric is a measure of defence against America’s enemies (do,serif enemies). And if you think private enterprises lose all their business rights when it comes to anything relating to, the then, or current sitting President (I’ll make this clear for you, the President is only a Temp employee hired by the people of the US that is also subject to removal/dismissal) then you favour Dictatorship over Democracy as you want to set aside all those rights and laws and replace it with the only law of the land being the Law of Trump.

What you need to do is assess why he is really doing this: to make money! He’s just another Kardashian in that way as their source of income is popularity. Right as he came out with what I strongly believe will be a bogus lawsuit he asked for donations. He’s not going to run again, but as long aspeople think he will they will keep throwing money at him and money and fame are the only things he cares about.

You view Twitter as an effective way to communicate with constituents. If you believe 140-280 characters is an effective communication method, why are you writing long posts? Why aren’t all your posts held to a 140-280 character limit? But if you believe 140-280 characters is the most effective way to communicate to his constituents I guess you are calling everyone who voted for him too stupid to understand any thing longer than that. Well, I guessed you failed to recognize that he has an entire communication department that he rarely used to make “official statements”, you know, meaningful ones. Instead, he had to use Twitter and then his communications directors were in constant cleanup mode trying to walk back his tweets. He also had the ability to hold press conferences in front of reporters,and then have media air it and report on it but he rarely used.these. Both avenues are not subject to the terms and conditions of Twitter so they should have been preferred. No president relied on Twitter like a drug addiction needing a fix before Trump. He choose to use a platform that was not under his, or the governments control, at the risk of being kicked off instead of all the traditional channels at his immediate disposal. He violated Twitter’s terms, got kicked off, cried about it like a big baby and that his problem.

As for me calling you an idiot and other words, I have said this over and over again, you (and the other dumbfucks) started with the insults towards me first. Others like Sy barite can keep the discussion civil, but your impulses meant you could not. Once the gloves come off they NEVER go back on. So as long as you are on this board, you will be on the receiving end of that language from me, forever.

Bring it buddy, you don’t stand a chance.

You can’t answer simple questions. What exactly did Trump tweet that got him banned? How do you keep commenting on Twitter, when you don’t have an account? Why would I have to prove Trump’s case? I simply informed you of what the case was, after you got it wrong. How do you not see your double standards and those exhibited by social media companies? At the very least it was collusion for them all to ban at the same time. Why did Trump get banned from Pinterest?

You’re right, Twitter isn’t the best way to communicate. But for Trump it was. Was he supposed to call CNN and setup an interview? All his press secretaries got called liars, how were they supposed to be effective? And I assume you’re going into say, “they were liars”. Don’t be stupid.

Give up, bro. I’m assuming you’re good at whatever you do in your field, but you haven’t done the work in this subject. You can’t see the clear bias in politics, media/social media, and the all out attack there was on Trump. Both Sy Barite and Sybarite don’t like Trump, and both of them have told you the same thing. Why don’t you listen?

At least be reasonable and have a discussion instead of repeating Democrat talking points. I don’t expect us to agree, but don’t be so bias. You can’t even admit things that are agreed on by everyone.

 

[Hornet]

Bring it buddy, you don’t stand a chance.

You can’t answer simple questions. What exactly did Trump tweet that got him banned? How do you keep commenting on Twitter, when you don’t have an account? Why would I have to prove Trump’s case? I simply informed you of what the case was, after you got it wrong. How do you not see your double standards and those exhibited by social media companies? At the very least it was collusion for them all to ban at the same time. Why did Trump get banned from Pinterest?

You’re right, Twitter isn’t the best way to communicate. But for Trump it was. Was he supposed to call CNN and setup an interview? All his press secretaries got called liars, how were they supposed to be effective? And I assume you’re going into say, “they were liars”. Don’t be stupid.

Give up, bro. I’m assuming you’re good at whatever you do in your field, but you haven’t done the work in this subject. You can’t see the clear bias in politics, media/social media, and the all out attack there was on Trump. Both Sy Barite and Sybarite don’t like Trump, and both of them have told you the same thing. Why don’t you listen?

At least be reasonable and have a discussion instead of repeating Democrat talking points. I don’t expect us to agree, but don’t be so bias. You can’t even admit things that are agreed on by everyone.

I started commenting on Twitter in response to you asking me why I’m not commenting on the Twitter examples you are throwing my way you fucking moron. You asked for a Twitter discussion dumbass.

If you think the world is without biases you are a lost cause. I’ve mentioned the cessation of the Fairness Doctrine which I responded to Sy barite about (go read it). Once that ended the biases that were already there exasperated further. Even then, that applied to traditional media and social media is uncharted territory. Fuck, even Zuckerberg went before Congress looking for guidance. I’ve also said I want it back but I recognize that is the playing field we play in. In 2016, Clinton lost and the right called the left cry babies. Now the right are bigger cry babies than the left ever was. How’s that Arizona “audit” coming and how many election fraud lawsuit did Trump win?

Trump incited an insurrection (those arrested charged even admitted to that in their defence), those private companies acted to stop the rhetoric that could cause it to happen again and that is well within their legal right to do. Trump will lose his lawsuit and you’ll see because the first amendment doesn’t apply to private companies. Your big baby Trump couldn’t deal with losing an election fair and square as his ego couldn’t handle it. But his rhetoric is continuing to divide the country, caused an insurrection and now some of his followers are even saying that either he’s reinstated in August or there will be civil war. So social media private companies can do whatever they damn well please, if it’s within their legal rights, to stop that rhetorical to prevent more insurrections and violence. You are the one with a bug up his ass about Trump and the Twitter ban, so you want to argue his side, then argue it and don’t run away and hide saying you don’t have to argue his case. The mere fact you started commenting on it means you started arguing his side a d now you are running for cover. The burden in any case is on the complainant and not the defendant. But go ahead and retreat hoping Sy barite will come and rescue you. As for “what did he tweet” specifically? If you had brains you could do your own damn research.

Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump

Suspension of @realDonaldTrump

blog.twitter.com

I don’t have a Pinterest account either so I don’t give a shit what they do. But this is probably your most laughable point yet. “Collusion”? here’s Rudy talking collusion

Now, this is so rich that your guy, that you defended, will use ”collusion is not a crime” as a defence when it’s in his favour then you use as an argument here that it is indeed a crime. Well, what is it? Is it a crime or not? Well, whatever it is you bringing it up is a clear “double standard”. Did it even ever occur to you that it wasn’t collusion at all but independent, and immediate, reactions to January 6th riots, and they all saw this was a result of Trump’s rhetoric so they had to act quickly? No, because you yourself are completely biased and won’t look at anything that doesn’t support your already entrenched view point.


That is a very rich statement “agreed by everyone”. You mean all 320 million Americans or just you and Sy barite because “everyone’s” is not commenting here, just a few of us. Sybarite (no space) has been quiet in this discussion as it turned to Trump so why are you trying to drag him in. He doesn’t seem to me to be a guy afraid to speak his mind so if he wants to say something, I’m sure he would. Even so, you now have to run and hide behind them because you can’t make you own case. “Everyone” here sees that is how you operate: yell, deflect, distract, retreat and hide behind sy barite. Fight your own fights coward.

I said he could call a press conference and the reporters could have a scrum and ask questions. They can also issue a statement. Not once did I say he should called CNN for an interview. Stop making shit up.

 

[stripfan]

Mandatory vaccination equals mandatory death. Getting vaxxed is no different than playing Russian roulette.

Account Suspended

 

[altaguetta]

Not having a Covid problem is dangerous to a president's health.

Those damned conspiracy theorists are always right...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1414622742058577922

Let's see what happens after his death

Haiti COVID - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer

Haiti Coronavirus update with statistics and graphs: total and new cases, deaths per day, mortality and recovery rates, current active cases, recoveries, trends and timeline.

www.worldometers.info

 

[stripfan]

You need a booster shot for your booster shot.

Even the NYT admits covid vaccines don’t work against variants like Delta – NaturalNews.com

The New York Times now admits that the original covid vaccines do not work against the current mutated form of the coronavirus. New research published in Nature states the obvious, that the Delta strain is able to bypass the antibodies produced by vaccination. This was the plan all along, to...

www.naturalnews.com

 

[stripfan]

Greta Thunberg is now promoting vaccines. I guess climate change doesn't grab people's attention like it used to.

Greta Thunberg Teams Up With Somali Criminal to Push Jabs

article - https://www.infowars.com/posts/greta-thunbergs-pro-vaccination-photo-op-with-criminal-rapper-raises-eyebrows/ Website: https://saltmustflow.com OTHER PLATFORMS: Odysee: https://odysee.com/@SaltyCracker:a Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thesaltycracker/ Rumble...

www.bitchute.com

 

[stripfan]

This must be the most shocking vaccine death case yet.

Father and Daughter died four days apart despite taking different brands of COVID vaccines – NaturalNews.com

This is tragic story out of Michigan that was disclosed by Kathryn Kendall. She lost both her father and her sister within four days of one another, and they were vaccinated with different brands of covid vaccines. (Article by Angela Bininger republished from GlobalResearch.ca) John Robert...

www.naturalnews.com

 

[Fakes125]

Got my second dose on Saturday, got really feverish the night of and the whole day of Sunday. Now I'm good

 

[altaguetta]

Greta Thunberg is now promoting vaccines. I guess climate change doesn't grab people's attention like it used to.

Greta Thunberg Teams Up With Somali Criminal to Push Jabs

article - https://www.infowars.com/posts/greta-thunbergs-pro-vaccination-photo-op-with-criminal-rapper-raises-eyebrows/ Website: https://saltmustflow.com OTHER PLATFORMS: Odysee: https://odysee.com/@SaltyCracker:a Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thesaltycracker/ Rumble...

www.bitchute.com

 

[altaguetta]

Got my second dose on Saturday, got really feverish the night of and the whole day of Sunday. Now I'm good

 

[altaguetta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1414668238500384774

 

[altaguetta]

More vaccinations won't stop the cases. Weird, isn't it?

 

[stripfan]

More vaccinations won't stop the cases. Weird, isn't it?
View attachment 159640
View attachment 159641

They want you to keep getting vaccinated over and over again, till you run out of luck and drop dead.

 

[altaguetta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1415126140256231444

 

[altaguetta]

A company is getting ready for the next phase of the never ending pandemic

https://twitter.com/x/status/1414991590444044296