Gentil

[Unregistered]

But Ctor of the researristineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Bruhn, dichrector of the resear at UC Davis and autho Bruhn, dtor of the researristineCenirector of the r ofrector of the retor of the researristineCensearthe study was most surprised by therector of the resear “p Bruhn, director of the revalence of undercooking.â€￾

 

[Unregistered]

But Ctor of thn, diche researristineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Bruhrector of the reshe researristineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Bruear at UC Davis and autho Bruhn, dtor of the researristineCenirector of the r ofrector of the retor of the researristineCensearthe study was most surprised by therector of the resear “p Bruhn, direhe researristineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brutor of the revalence of undercooking.â€￾

 

[Unregistered]

But Ctor of thn, diche retineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brsearrisuhrector of the reshe restineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener BrearristineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Bruear at UC Davis and autho Bruhn, dtor of the researristineCenirector of the r ofrector of the retor of the researristineCenstineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brearthe study was most surprised by therector of the resear “p Bruhn, direhe researristineCenhrecter of the CotineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brnsumtor of the researristineCener Brutor of the revalence of undercooking.â€￾

 

[Unregistered]

t Ctor of thn, diche enhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener enhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brsearrisuhrector Brsearrisuhrectorenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brsearrisuhrector retineCof the reshe restineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener BrearristineCenhrecter of tenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brsearrisuhrector he Consumtor of the researristineCener Bruear at UC Davis and autho Bruhn, dtor of the researristineCenirector of the r ofrector of the retor of the researristineCenstineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of

 

[Unregistered]

or of thn, diche encter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener hreenhrecter of the Consumtorcter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener of the researristineCener Brsearrisuhrector Brsecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener arrisuhrectorenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener Brsearrisucter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener hrector retineCof the reshe restineCenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener BrearristineCenhrecter of tenhrecter of the Consumtor of the researristineCener B

 

[jake the snake]

Owing to their prevalence, potential beneficial (or otherwise) biological roles of aluminium compounds are of continuing interest.

 

[jake the snake]

ts. Aluminium mirror finish has the highest of any metal in the 200–400 nm nd the 3,000–10,000 nm (far regions; in the 400–700 nm visible range it is slightly outperformed by ndin the 700–3000 (near IR)

 

[jake the snake]

Compared to most other metals, it is difficult to extract from ore, such igh reactivity of aluminium and the high melting point of most of its ores. For example, direct reduction wd to produchemically possible because aluminium is a stronger reducing agent than carbon. Indirect carbothermic reduction can be carried out using carbon and Al[SUB]2[/SUB]O[SUB]3[/SUB], which forms an intermediate Al[SUB]4[/SUB]C[SUB]3[/SUB] and this can further yield aluminium metal at a temperature of 1900–2000 °C. This process is stil

 

[jake the snake]

O[SUB]2[/SUB] than theustrial process for aluminium extractionlytic smelting of alumina was originally cost-prohibitive in part because of the high melting point of alumina, or aluminium oxide, (about 2,000 °C (3,600 °F)). Many minerals, however, dissolve into a second already molten mineral, even if the temperature of the melt is significantly lower than the melting point of the first mineral. Molten iscovered to dissolve alumina at temperatures significantly lower than the melting point of pure alumina without interfering in the smelting process. In th

 

[jake the snake]

A1 -Mendeleev davriy sistemasining III guruhiga mansub kimyoviy element. Tartib raqami 13, at. m. 26,9815; A. lot. alumen (achchiqgosh) so‘zidan kelib chiqqan. Tabi-atda bitta barqaror izotop holida (AG‘ 100%) uchraydi, bir necha sun’iy radio-aktiv izotoplari bor, ular orasida eng ahamiyatlisi A12’ (yarim yemirilish dav-ri 7,4-105 y.). A. yer po‘stining og‘irlik jihatdan 8,8%ini tashkil etadi, ya’ni u kislorod va kremniydan keyin uchin-chi, metallar ichida esa birinchi o‘rinda turadi. Metall holidagi A.ni birinchi mart

 

[jake the snake]

825 y. X. K. Ersted topgan. A. ta-biatda sof holda uchramaydi, uning eng ko‘p uchraydigan birikmalari: alyumosi-likatlar (mas, tuproqning asosiy qismi bo‘lgan alyumosilikat, kaolin, andaluzit, alunit minerali), korund (alyuminiy oksid) va boksit. O‘zbekistonda shular-dan kaolin (Toshkent viloyati) va boksit (Navoiy va Farg‘ona viloyatlari) topil-gan. A. giltuproq (A12O,)ni kriolit (Na3AlF6) bilan suyuqlantirib, elektroliz qilish yo‘li bilan olinadi. Giltuproq esa asosan boksitdan olinadi. O‘zbekistonda Angren kaolinidan ham giltuproq olish mumkinligi aniqlangan. A. kumushday oq metall, allot-ropik shakl o‘zgarishlari (q. Allotropiya)

 

[jake the snake]

uyuqlanish t-rasi — 660’, qaynash t-rasi 2500° atrofida, S. og‘. 2,6989. A. plastik, oson presslanuvchan, bolg‘alanuvchan, qoliplanadigan,cho‘ziladigan metall. 380A. barcha barqaror bi-rikmalarida 3 va-lentli, yuqori t-rada ba’zan 1, kamdan-kam hollarda 2 va-lentli bo‘lishi mum-kin. A. sirka, vino, limon kislotalari va b. organik moddalar ta’siriga turg‘un. A. kislorod bilan tez b pri kadi, shu sa-babli uning usti hamisha oksid pardasi bilan qoplangan bo‘ladi; oksid pardasi zich bo‘lganidan u A.ni zanglashdan va turli moddalar ta’siridan saqlaydi. A. kuku-ni shiddat bilan yonadi, yuqori t-rada galo-genlar bilan birikib, A. ftorid (A1F3), A. xlorid (A1S13), A. bromid (A1Vg3), A. yodid (A1J3), A. astatid (AlAt3), ol-tingugurt bilan A. sulfid (A12S3), azot bilan A.nitrid (A1N3), uglerod bilan A. k

 

[jake the snake]

The book st published in Japanese in 1987, and in English in 1989, has the following: "Just remember, life is like a box of chocolates." ... "You know, they've got these chocolate assortments, and you like some but you don't like others? And you eat all the ones you like, and the only ones left are the ones you don't like as much? I always think about that when something painful comes up. "Now I just have to polish these off, and everything'll be OK.' Life is a box of chocolates."

 

[jake the snake]

Catnip drive felines crazy, causing them to roll around on the floor and paw at invisible birds flying in their vicinity, but why?
Humans have used catnip for recreational purposes, as smoking the substance produces some interesting effects. How does catnip affect felines and why does it cause such wild responses? Are cat owners willfully doping their pets?

 

[jake the snake]

But of course. I gueBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ore there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammalBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.s were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.e lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.

 

[jake the snake]

But of course. I gueBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ore there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammalBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions oBut of course. I gueBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ore there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammalBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.s were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.e lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. f years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.s were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.e lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.

 

[jake the snake]

. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ore there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammalBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions oBut of course. I gueBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of amammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ore there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed. lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammalBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions oBut of course. I gueBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of a

 

[jake the snake]

still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating thingstill apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs. s and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.rt, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.uess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.

 

[jake the snake]

s will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating thingstill apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mamms will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating thingstill apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of tre were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of t

 

[jake the snake]

and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating thingstill apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mamms will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are stiland cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ing millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.re apes of any soBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating thingstill apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, t of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. WBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.around, drug use already existed.e see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ss I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes anBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.d always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We seBut of But of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and gettingBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mamms will be part of that classification. I was jBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just saying millions of years before chimps and protohumans were around, drug use already existed.ust sayBut of course. I gBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there weBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eal apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals eating things and getting lit off it. I'm just sayBut of course. I guess I didn't make that clear. Yes, we are still apes and always will be part of that classification. I was just saying long before there were apes of any sort, mammals were taking drugs.
I'm just making the point that catnip and cats isn't unique. We see lots of mammals ea