Tenple of Tantric Bliss.....from C/L

[Riley S:)]

After an amazing session with Kassondra, I was hooked into the whole Tantra thing. However, on the constant quest for that hidden gem, I scoured all the erotic ads on C/L.

Our friend (Marian on Marpole) has several pictures on her CL add, that must be at least 20 years old. I fell hook line and sinker for the hot sexy blond look, and the well written add promising that I would indulge in sensual pleasures with a sultry blonde Goddess!

The apartment was far from upscale, and I was ushered into a cluttered spare room with a massage table and a couch. Now, as I was looking to take the journey to new heights of euphoria, I opted for the 90 min session for $$.
I should have realized the silliness of my predicament after being greeted by a lady well into her late 50’s. But hey, I’m the first to admit, especially when it comes to pooning, I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

I have had many a massage, and this was easily among the worst. There was nothing Tantra about it, and certainly nothing therapeutic. But no worries, the promised body slide will make up for it. Right???. Wrong! At some point during the message while my face was buried in the head rest, my granny got naked. My body slide consisted of her running her tits up and down my back for 10 seconds, while she murmoured “this is the bodyslide, MMMMmmmmm”. I’m like WTF.

After the flip, I get a reasonable HJ (mind you, not really considering the donation), but nothing special, and she stayed far enough away to prevent any real touching. Some enthusiastic comments to finish the dead, once again, completely non tantra related.

All in all, a complete waste of time and two browns.
L – 3 (an oldie with a Gunt)
A – 6 she was pleasant enough
S – 4 not even remotely as promised.

 

[Rob C]

Sorry for your bad experience.
Thanks for warning us.

It's always a good idea to check reviews before venturing forth.

 

[caitlin]

Thanks man... I posted a couple of 411's about her and received good intel. She is way older than advertised- this review board saved my bacon on this WOT. Its a shame really... with the loss of Christina I was hoping the advertising was all true!

 

[Nibej]

lesson learned....... no good reviews, no visits for the master bater.

I will continue on my quest for the holy grail of massage and hj queen!

 

[DevinL]

Maren in White Rock is very good at both activities. She works topless, allows some butt and breast fondling, but no kitty play.
If that fits your bill, do a search on her.
Also recommended, with similar limits, Medeleine in the West End.

Both of these women are notably less expensive than your disappointing outing.

For more, I recommned that you search on tantric, massage, and rub & tug.

 

[Pompal 09.]

I just saw this SP this past weekend and I don't quite agree with everything being said here. I agree with the general idea that the service provided is not up to par. Here's what I disagree with:
I don't think she is in her late 50's. My guess would be late 30's to mid 40's.

I actually enjoyed the massage I recieved. My first experience with tantric was with Shakti, and while Angelina (her name during my session) was not up to that standard, it wasn't a terrible massage at all.

I was given ample opportunity to touch her after the flip. I touched her ass, back, stomach and enhanced breasts a great deal.

I really enjoyed my HJ. She did not just stroke it until I came. She would play with my chest/nipples for a few second, then work down my body and then stroke my penis a few times before returning to the chest and repeating the process. This actually resulted in a very powerful orgasm for me.

Here's what I agree with:

The session was not what I would refer to as tantric. Again, my reference here is Shakti and if Shakti is a reasonable standard for tantric massage, then Angelina/Marion is not tantric.

She is not a gorgeous blonde. Her body is pretty decent but she is not attractive in the face department. I do feel as though the CL pics are misleading.

The apartment is not upscale and the room was messy and cramped.

While I don't normall provide the L-A-S rating any longer, I will in this case just to provide a point of reference.
L - 4.5 (not a looker, but her body was okay)
A - 7 (she seemed to enjoy what she was doing, she is sweet and talkative, and treated me nicely)
S - 5.5 (less than I expected, but not so bad after all)

That being said, I will also say that I will not repeat. Considering the 200/90 minutes price (which is what I paid Shakti when I saw her) this SP is overpriced. Shakti was much more active and created a far, far, far more intimate session. I walked out of this session feeling okay. I walked out of my Shakti session in love.

 

[sj_red]

So you agree with pretty much everything other than the age???

Now that i know her name, a search on these forums comfirms similar supporting info regarding her age. I stand firm on my original comments.

MB

 

[Violet]

Well, not actually. I also disagreed with you assessment of the massage. I thought that was good, but not up to Shakti's standard.

I also disagreed with the amount I got to touch her. I thought I had good access to everything, you did not.

I also disagreed about the HJ, which I enjoyed, even if it was not convential. You thought it only reasonable.

I did agree with much of what you said. I guess I just thought you were a bit too harsh. Not totally wrong, just harsh maybe.

I also think she has used the name "April" before as well. I remember the pic of her taken from the side with April as the advertised name.

It is pretty suspicious when they feel they have to use so many names in such a short period of time.

 

[corvette!!]

My comments could be construed as harsh, and I am comfortable with that in this particular review. After all, her add is a total misrepresentation as to the reality of the situation.

Like you, I have been spoiled (in my case Kassondra), and for two browns for non f/s, one can afford to be critical!

MB

 

[Sandy]

I agree with you in principle. 200/90 minutes w/no f/s does mean that something else has to be included to compensate for no f/s. Angelina does not add enough (as does Shakti and Kassondra) to make the price worthwhile.

Here's a question: how much would you pay for 90 minutes with Angelina? I think I would repeat if the price were 100-140, but probably not any higher than that.

 

[mars]

From what's been described here and in other reviews, I'd say $80 at most.

 

[knowledge_dispenser]

I saw Angelina last weekend. For a rookie pooner it was the biggest mistake and waste of $$ I have made.

She says she is in her late 30's - NOT A CHANCE. Though for someone who is in her late forties, she looks great. She should update her pictures on CL because she if deffinitely deceiving us. I noticed that her ad yesterday has a new picture that is 100% not her, and today her CL ad has no pics.

I paid for the 90 minute session and took a shower at her place after the massage. It wasn't until I left her building that I noticed the time and it was only about 85 minutes since I entered her building. I fully beleived that I had received a 90 minute session and the optional shower was on extra time. I think that if I paid for 60 minutes, I would have showered on unpaid time.

Her massage and bodyslide techniques are awful. She stayed in an awkward position for my hands and when whe sid that I could touch her, it was damn hard and awkward. Eventually I gave up as I found it distracting to focus on.

She does provide a teasing handjob that leaves you on the brink.

Never again unless she wakes up, realizes she's outdated, takes some massage/tantra training, and cuts her rates in half.

TUGGER

 

[<<TANZ>>]

Sorry, but in my particular case, she is a DNR at any cost.
Far too many proven ladies out there to gamble on a repeat visit.

 

[captain futility]

Tugger,

Sorry to see your story was similar to mine!

I was so negative about the entire review i never even mentioned the time aspect. Including shower, I was in and out in 70 minutes.

You are correct about her add today on CL. Picture couldnt be any further than reality

 

[FUHummer]

You know, maybe I just try to hard to try to find some good in all of the SPs I have seen. I guess that might be a good personal trait most of the time, but perhaps not the best when reviewing SPs on eforum.xxx. I guess some SPs just do provide sub-par service. I agree that Angelina is definately sub-par.

To be brutally honest, Angelina is no longer very attractive. Her service really is far less than I expected and what I have had in the past. Okay, I'll admit it, Angelina sucks as a provide of any type of massage, let alone tantric style.

Maybe she needs to get out of the erotic massage business, take a class or two and switch to thearaputic massage instead. I think with some training and practice, she will do better in that field.

 

[DemonBookLover]

I'm a little confused about the dialogue, maybe too much booze last night.

If this is about Angelina in BBy, here services is good in a strange sort of way and her age would be about late 30's - mid 40'. She is good for a once a year visit with me because it is a change.

If this is about that broad who is just off Oak and 72, that broad is like 60 and completely useless. I stayed, but no release for me, I couldn't, ugh, gives me shivers thinking about it. No tantric touch, not the correct amount of time, place is dingy, $$ is way way too much.

 

[dad7734]

This post is about the Angelina near oak and 72nd.